برچسب: مذاكرات وين

The spokesman of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs said about the incidents and clashes that took place on the border between Iran and Afghanistan and the cause of these clashes: This incident was due to the unfamiliarity of the new border guard .

According to ISNA, Saeed Khatibzadeh in his weekly meeting with reporters continued: In the 900 km border between Iran and Afghanistan, in some parts of the walls and obstacles We have created to prevent the entry of smugglers and miscreants, some of these obstacles and walls are within a few hundred meters inside Iran in order to create these obstacles in a suitable place.

He continued: “The Taliban, who border the area, were not familiar with this issue and the zero point of the border, and they thought that the border would end after these obstacles.” Based on this misunderstanding, they opened fire on some Iranian citizens, who were subsequently forced to respond immediately by our border guards.

Khatibzadeh stated that this issue was stopped after a while, noting that efforts were made in Tehran and Kabul to bring this issue to a point of further understanding. The Taliban based in the border areas are now aware of this issue, and in order to prevent this from happening in the future, we have established direct lines of communication between the two sides so that such cases can be discussed immediately and we will not see such incidents again. .

He also answered another question regarding the decision of some countries to recognize the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan : The future of Afghanistan should be decided according to the will of the people of this country and certainly no A government that is not inclusive and does not reflect the ethnic and demographic composition of Afghanistan can not shape the future of Afghanistan for a clear and stable path, and this is an issue that was emphasized and heard at the Tehran summit.

The spokesman of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs in response to the threats of some Zionist regime officials about the possibility of attacking Iran said:

Khatibzadeh in response to a question about the UAE National Security Adviser’s visit to Tehran and the purpose of this visit “Iran and the UAE should reopen,” he said. “The UAE national security adviser has traveled to Tehran to meet with his Iranian counterpart.” The definitive policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is the policy of good neighborliness, and we are trying to redefine our relations with a country like the UAE at various levels, despite some disputed cases, and we have planned in this regard. Relations between Iran and the UAE are good at the economic level. There is serious cooperation between the two countries in this field and we have one of the most excellent relations in this regard. Iranians and various Iranian companies are active in the UAE, and despite some political and diplomatic problems, we have been able to show the maturity to minimize the damage to public and economic relations between the two countries.

Khatibzadeh continued: Mr. Bagheri’s recent visit to the UAE and his meeting with the officials of this country was to improve the relations between the two countries in various fields, including political, diplomatic and security fields. This trip (the visit of the UAE National Security Advisor to Iran) takes place within this framework. We have significant issues to discuss and it is clear that the Secretariat of the National Security Council will provide the necessary information regarding this trip and the talks.

This diplomat of our country also said about the visit of the Syrian Foreign Minister to Tehran : This visit was made in the framework of the relations between the two countries and the invitation of Mr. Amir Abdullahian. Syrian Foreign Minister Faisal Meqdad arrived in Tehran last night and will have detailed meetings with Iranian officials today, including Mr. Amir Abdullahian. One of the various topics during these talks is the review of the latest situation on the Syrian field, cooperation between Syria and Iran, as well as the Astana process.

“There is good cooperation between Iran and Syria and Russia, and this tripartite cooperation will also be discussed during this trip,” he said in response to a Sputnik reporter’s question about the trip.

He also said in response to another question whether there is a connection between the Syrian Foreign Minister’s visit to Tehran and the visit of the UAE National Security Adviser to Tehran, no.

Khatibzadeh noted in this regard: Syria is part of the Arab world community, the region and the international arena.

“We are pleased that various countries have come to the conclusion that their past policy on Syria has been wrong and that the future of Syria cannot be changed by conspiracies and specific plans,” he said.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also in response to another question about the published news about the Saudi Crown Prince’s visit to the Persian Gulf countries and that one of the topics of discussion during this visit will be Iran’s missile and nuclear issues,

He continued: “Countries such as Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran are present in the Persian Gulf region, and these eight countries can have regular talks with each other in a regional mechanism as soon as possible.” They are more appropriate and better, and this is very important for the future and development of the region.

Khatibzadeh continued: “Saudi officials are well aware of the level of relations between Iran and the UAE or the quality of Iran’s relations with Kuwait.”

“It is appropriate for countries like Saudi Arabia and Bahrain to return to these regional arrangements as soon as possible, and this is more appropriate for them as well,” he said.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also commented on the statements of the Israeli Prime Minister urging the world powers to put pressure on Iran : The occupying regime in Jerusalem has been opposed to any dialogue in the region from day one. have been. This regime is at the bottom of its legitimacy and is constantly seeking to project and create artificial issues related to international issues.

Referring to the Zionist regime’s opposition to Borjam and the holding of the Vienna talks, Khatibzadeh said: “This regime has not hidden from the first day that it is opposed to Borjam and has tried to disrupt it, and this is a clear record that needs no explanation.” / p>

He added: “The bitter point of history is that these statements are made by regime officials who have nuclear warheads. It is not a member of any international monitoring regime and has not accepted safeguards and is making every effort to covertly and openly disrupt the region.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: “The statements made are completely baseless and the person who makes these statements is also dishonorable, so to pay more attention to this issue and the statements is a waste of time.

Khatibzadeh also told reporters in response to another question that Taliban officials had sometimes commented on Iran, including that Iran was hosting some former officials. It’s Afghanistan, or whether Iran intends to attack the Kamal Khan Dam if Afghanistan does not open its water, or something like that, he told a questioning reporter. I hear.

“Iran is home to about four million Afghans, many of whom have entered Iran in the past few months,” he said. Iran has been hosting the displaced Afghans for the past four decades with brotherhood and trying to make Afghanistan a better future. The governing body of Afghanistan knows that the composition of our dear Afghans who are our guests in Iran are from different ethnic groups, ethnicities and religions of Afghanistan and we do not make a difference.

Emphasizing that we are in dialogue and in contact with all parties in Afghanistan, Khatibzadeh said: “The Afghan governing body knows what a great potential this access is.”

He continued: “Iran has shown that when something like the martyrdom of Iranian diplomats happened in Afghanistan, we tried to be a good neighbor despite the fact that there was no good neighbor on our eastern borders, and this definite policy of Iran as an anchor that It stabilizes the region.

A State Department spokesman also said in response to a question about comments that there was talk of an interim and step-by-step missile program or the FATF in the lifting of sanctions talks. He said: “We are negotiating in Vienna based on the drafts we gave to lift the sanctions and how to stop Iran’s compensatory measures against the lifting of sanctions by the parties, and as I have said before, there is something called a step agreement.” It is not essentially a step or a temporary plan.

Khatibzadeh In response to another question regarding the US Secretary of State’s remarks that Iran was not serious about returning to its obligations in the UN Security Council, and in this context, we ended the seventh round of Vienna talks, He said: “The party that is not a member of Borjam and has not only stopped all its obligations but has made every effort over the past years that no one adheres to Borjam and has punished anyone who has adhered to Borjam basically in a position Does not want to make such statements.

“Americans, instead of making statements that are more in the context of blaming and evading their responsibilities, it is better to go back to the easier way, which is to go back to their commitments and fulfill them,” he stressed.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also in response to another question that some of the negotiating parties with Iran during the Vienna talks claim that the Iranian negotiating team does not realize the urgency of the negotiations and the necessity of this issue,

“We entered the Vienna talks with a strong will and all our efforts are to reach a good agreement,” he stressed. We consider a good agreement in order to fulfill the obligations that everyone around us has in Barjam.

Khatibzadeh continued: “The small size of the Iranian delegation and its composition show that the main goal is that the same group in Tehran, which should decide on the dimensions of sanctions with multiple round trips, should decide there and Management and expertise were combined.

He added: “Perhaps the other side basically did not expect the Iranian team to give them ready-made written texts with an approach that a good agreement can be reached in the shortest possible time.” As soon as these texts were given, some media leaks and media statements were made in this regard, including that these texts are not doable or are maximalist.

Khatibzadeh said: “This is while everything that is written in these texts is based on Barjam and the draft of the previous six rounds of negotiations and basically could not be the maximum, but it seems that the approach of the United States and the other parties to do Their commitments are minimal, so they asked to return to their capitals for further consultations. The Iranian team immediately announced that in order to make a decision, it has both this permission and the composition of the team will allow them to stay in Vienna for as long as necessary and reach the necessary agreements in the texts, but due to the insistence of the other side to consult with Their capitals, Iran, also accepted this.

“The next round of talks will begin this weekend (the eighth round of Vienna talks) and the exact date will be finalized in the conversation between Mr. Bagheri and Mora,” a State Department spokesman explained. p>

He continued: “The important issue is that the other side, like Iran, will be present at the Vienna talks with specific proposals.” What we have can certainly be negotiated and examined, but it is a misconception that the other side only makes media statements or plays a game of blame and thinks that with this game it can influence the thoughts of Iranian decision-makers and elites. .

Khatibzadeh emphasized: “We know what we want in Vienna and what we want is completely within the framework of Barjam.” The other side did not object to the Iranian texts based on Borjam and said that it should investigate.

“We do not seem to be in a hurry, nor do we allow anyone to play with our time and energy in Vienna,” he said. The Iranian team will go to these negotiations with the determination to reach a good agreement, and we hope that the other side will come with the same determination.

“In response to another question about the Vienna talks and whether Iran has said it will provide a third document and whether it is possible to provide details of this document,” the State Department spokesman said. He entered Vienna with interaction and flexibility, but the other side either did not have such a thing on the agenda or did not show it to us. We have also exercised the necessary interaction and flexibility in forming working groups and related issues. We look forward to receiving feedback from the other party on the two documents we have provided or if they have any suggestions.

He continued: “Where necessary, new documents and drafts can be exchanged.

Khatibzadeh said that the talks would resume this weekend, adding: “These talks have not stopped, but the delegations have been given a few days to breathe further and consult with their capitals.”

Foreign Ministry Spokesman Continues his Conversation with Journalists In response to the recent remarks of the Secretary General of the Arab League that Iran and its allies in the region are trying to take control of the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Bab al-Mandeb “This is not the first time such a statement has been made by this Arab League official,” he said

He emphasized: Custom statements are completely useless for custom purposes.

Khatibzadeh stated that Iran is both responsible in its security sphere and that it has made every effort to be an anchor of stability: “I recommend that the Arab world prioritize unity as its main priority.” It is between Muslim and Arab countries and it should not cause further divisions in the Arab world with such statements, because it benefits from such irresponsible statements of the occupying regime in Jerusalem.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also commented on the recent remarks of French President Emmanuel Macron during a visit to the region regarding Iran’s nuclear program and Tehran’s regional policies . Their purchases may be said and passed, but it is not accurate because France is one of the parties to the P5 + 1 and knows very well what documents and understandings this international mechanism is based on.

He added: “These statements have no legal or rational basis and have more internal and media benefits.

“We expect a country like France to act responsibly,” he said. “What is happening as over-militarization of our region is unacceptable.” It is based on these unrests and house-burning wars against the defenseless and oppressed people of Yemen. The destructive role of destabilization resulting from the actions of countries like France in the region should not be overlooked.

Khatibzadeh continued: “We are witnessing the sale of billions of dollars of advanced weapons to the countries of the Persian Gulf, while they are meeting for a few of our missiles, and these issues are not acceptable.

“They should pay attention to the fact that Iran is not talking to anyone about its security, and given the current situation, we are serious about completing our people’s defense shield,” he said.

“The industry of interfering in the affairs of other countries is carrying out coups and plotting and assassinating an industry that is sealed,” a State Department spokesman said in a statement. Eternally made in America is eaten on it.

“Human rights are a sublime concept that has unfortunately been a tool in the box for decades,” said a State Department spokesman. It has been an instrument of American foreign policy under which it intervenes in the affairs of various countries.

Khatibzadeh continued: “The United States has tried to do this in every country it has set foot on, using concepts such as human rights and democracy, while the main goal has been to realize its interests.

Foreign Ministry spokesman referring to the upcoming 16 Azar, which has been named as Student Day in Iran, added: 16 Azar is a reminder of the opposition of Iranian students to the coup of 28 August. The history of Iran will never forget the overthrow of the government elected by the people and overthrown by the US coup with the British intelligence service.

Our Foreign Ministry spokesman also in response to a question about the timing of our Foreign Minister’s visit to China said: “I do not have an idea about the exact time of this trip now, but this trip is in the past weeks. Has been planned.

He also said about the implementation of the 25-year cooperation document between Iran and China : “As I have said before, various meetings have been held on issues related to this document. Some projects This document is being finalized. This is the final document and today we are implementing its various clauses.

Our Foreign Ministry Spokesman continues his conversation with reporters In response to the question of how much the Iranian team has referred to the previous talks in the recent Vienna talks, and some media statements confirm that when Iran submits its proposed text “Even China and Russia are surprised by this text and Iran’s demands.” I was not present at the talks to see the surprise of the people, The reports I have seen and read have emphasized that the other side has strongly emphasized that Iran’s request for the lifting of sanctions should be implemented.

Khatibzadeh continued: “China and Russia have already stated that US sanctions against Iran should be lifted and the US should fulfill its obligations.”

He said: “What Iran has presented as its draft is entirely based on the text of the draft that has been done in the previous six rounds of negotiations, and it is natural that the text has been presented with the views of the Iranian negotiating team.” ما متن را از ابتدا ننوشته‌ایم و در متن ارائه شده متن شش دور مذاکرات قبلی مبنا قرار داده شده است و ما نظرات خود را اعلام کرده ایم.

خطیب زاده ادامه داد: در بالای متن همان طور که پیش از این نیز گفته‌ایم یک اصل نوشته شده مبنی بر اینکه ما هیچ توافقی نداریم مگر اینکه درباره همه چیز به توافق برسیم.

وی ادامه داد: انشاءالله آخر این هفته طرف های اروپایی با پیشنهادهای مشخص یا پاسخ‌های مشخص به متن پیشنهادی ایران وارد وین خواهند شد و ما برای رسیدن به یک توافق خوب با یک هیئت تصمیم گیر و کارشناسی مذاکرات را ادامه خواهیم داد.

سخنگوی وزارت امور خارجه همچنین در پاسخ به سوالی در مورد برخی از فضاسازی ها به خصوص فضاسازی رسانه های غربی در مورد هفتمین دور مذاکرات وین و همچنین برخی از مسائلی که در داخل کشور براساس این گزارشات رسانه‌ای در مورد این مذاکرات مطرح شده است، گفت: ما همواره این درخواست را مطرح کرده ایم که سیاست خارجی را نباید گروگان سیاست داخلی بکنیم و چنین امری کاری نادرست است. البته این به این معنا نیست که نقد یا اظهارنظری مطرح نشود یا افراد نکاتی که مایل هستند را به ما نگویند ولی موضوع این است که نباید اجازه داد که رسانه‌هایی که ابزار مذاکراتی غربی‌ها هستند به داخل ایران وارد شوند و ما باید حریم امن آرامش مردم را خود حفظ کنیم.

خطیب زاده با بیان اینکه این سخن به این معنا نیست که رسانه ها دیدبان مردم نباشند و یا رکن چهارم دموکراسی نیستند بلکه رسانه ها باید به وظایف خود در این زمینه عمل کنند ولی موضوع این است که کسی خدایی ناکرده شیپور رسانه های غربی در داخل کشور نشود، ادامه داد: ما به همه عزیزان توصیه می کنیم که به مذاکره کنندگان خود اعتماد کنند، حامی آن‌ها باشند، از آن ها حمایت کنند و البته نظرات و دیدگاه های خود را نیز چه به صورت توصیه و چه به صورت انتقاد مطرح کنند و ما را در جریان آن قرار دهند.

وی همچنین در پاسخ به سوال دیگری در ارتباط با مذاکرات گفت: مردم از هیئت مذاکره کننده انتظار دارند که منافع آن ها به صورت قطعی و با دقت لحاظ شود. ایران عزم قطعی برای رسیدن به توافق دارد و براساس همین ملاحظات این دو سند از سوی ایران ارائه شده است و بهتر است که طرف های مقابل با پیشنهادات مشخصی در مورد پیشنهادات ایران به خصوص بندهای مربوط به رفع تحریم ها به وین بیایند.

سخنگوی وزارت خارجه همچنین در این نشست مطبوعاتی تأکید کرد: همان طور که پیش از این بارها گفته ایم ما چیزی کمتر از برجام را نمی پذیریم و به چیزی بیشتر از برجام نیز تعهد نمی دهیم.

وی ادامه داد: تعهدات هسته ای ما در چارچوب برجام روشن است و باید تکلیف تحریم ها روشن شود.

خطیب زاده همچنین در پاسخ به سوال ایسنا در ارتباط با برخی از اخبار منتشر شده مبنی بر اینکه سه شهروند ایرانی در هرات افغانستان توسط طالبان بازداشت شده اند، گفت: در این باره اطلاعی ندارم ولی در مورد برخی از موضوعات کنسولی بین ما و هیئت حاکمه سرپرستی افغانستان بحث و گفت وگو شده است. از جمله مسائلی که بعضا برای خبرنگاران و یا عکاسان ایرانی رخ داده است. در این ارتباط گفت وگو شده است و ما کمک کرده ایم که اگر مسائلی وجود دارد برطرف شود. در مورد موضوع مورد اشاره اطلاعی ندارم و تا آنجا که می دانم در آماری که داریم کسی را به عنوان بازداشتی در افغانستان نداریم.

سخنگوی وزارت خارجه در این نشست همچنین فرا رسیدن روز دانشجو و همچنین روز پرستار را گرامی داشت و از پرستاران به عنوان بخشی از جامعه مدافعان سلامت تشکر و قدردانی کرد.

وی همچنین در این نشست مطبوعاتی در پاسخ به سوال دیگری در ارتباط با مذاکرات افزود: براساس سیاست دولت تمرکز اصلی و قطعی ما رفع تحریم ها است و بندهای رفع تحریمی را در پیش نویس جدید که مبتنی بر پیش نویس قبلی است ارائه کردیم و تا موقعی که منافع لغو تحریمی حاصل نشود و موانع در این زمینه برطرف نشود نمی شود در مورد بندهای دیگر اظهار نظر کرد.

سخنگوی وزارت امور خارجه کشورمان همچنین در پاسخ به سوال ایسنا که در مورد اتفاقات اخیر رخ داده در منطقه «بادرود» و «نطنز» علی‌رغم توضیحاتی که در این  ارتباط از سوی نهادهای ایرانی از جمله  پدافند غیرعامل  مطرح شده است، مقامات رژیم صهیونیستی اظهارنظرهایی را مطرح کرده اند، گفت : در مورد این قضیه چیزی بیش از آنچه ستاد کل نیروهای مسلح و دبیرخانه شورای عالی  امنیت ملی گفته، ندارم که اضافه کنم. این در همان چارچوب قابل پاسخ است.
 وی ادامه داد: اگر اتفاقی افتاده بود مانند همه اتفاقات و خرابکاری های رژیم صهیونیستی به مردم گزارش می شد و چیزی بیشتر از این ندارم اضافه کنم.

به گزارش ایسنا، خطیب زاده در این نشست به مانند نشست های قبل  گزارشی از عملکرد یک هفته ای اخیر وزارت امور خارجه از جمله هفتمین دور مذاکرات وین ارائه کرد . 

انتهای پیام

A senior State Department official described the latest status of the talks in Vienna at a briefing.

According to ISNA, the details of this conversation are as follows:
Please describe the latest status of the talks, the most important developments and the challenges ahead.
Well, first of all, it should be noted that this was the first round of talks held by the new government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and considering the unresolved deadlocks in the sixth round, it was already clear that in this round of talks The final result was reached. However, the government was of the opinion that the negotiating team should be present in Vienna during this round of talks, both in terms of expertise and composition, as well as in terms of texts and suggestions, because first of all, the negotiating team was sent on a mission to achieve A good deal had been reached in Vienna, and secondly, it was anticipated that some opposing parties might accuse the Islamic Republic of Iran of lack of seriousness and lack of clear proposals during this round of talks. The new government entered the talks with a pragmatic approach and a clear plan, and before the delegation’s visit to Vienna, Iran’s proposals were finalized and ready to be presented to the other side.
It is necessary to emphasize that the proposed text of Iran is based on the draft of the previous 6 rounds and the same text is the basis and the amendments and proposals proposed by Iran are specified and presented on the text. These proposals are naturally not maximal because they are presented in full compliance with Borjam, but unfortunately the other side’s approach to its obligations is minimal.
In the same context, on the third day of the talks, the Islamic Republic delegation presented two draft texts outlining Iran’s proposals and reforms, one on the lifting of sanctions and the other on nuclear issues.
My guess is that especially the European parties, as well as the United States, which is in constant contact with these three countries, did not expect that Iran at this stage with a full text that is in compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 2231 and Preserve the common principles of the dialogue of previous eras and enter into negotiations. That is why the other side, since receiving these drafts, has raised the issue of stopping the dialogue and returning to the capitals for consultation.
Although the Iranian delegation’s negotiating approach was necessary from the first day, it was interactive and flexible, but unfortunately, in front of the three European countries, they do not have much decision-making power in Vienna. have. While these talks are taking place between Iran and the P5 + 1, not Iran and the United States (which is basically not a member of Borjam), this approach by the Europeans has challenged the progress of the talks.
It is clear that the Western parties, who came to Vienna with the idea of ​​granting small concessions and receiving maximum concessions, were not completely satisfied with the texts and clear demands of the Islamic Republic of Iran, but none of these countries could object to these texts or Describe the conflict with Barjam. The only point made by these countries was that, firstly, they were not even willing to grant the concessions authorized by the UN Security Council, and secondly, they were not willing to re-discuss the issues raised in the drafts. However, what has been achieved from the previous six rounds of negotiations is only a draft, and as has been said many times, there has always been a basic principle that there is no agreement unless everything is agreed.
It is now clear that the US reluctance to give up sanctions altogether is the most important challenge to the progress of the talks. We believe that whenever the US government gives up its campaign of maximum pressure and the European parties show the necessary political will in the talks, the way will be opened to reach an agreement quickly.
How did you see the general atmosphere of the conversations? Have the parties entered into serious negotiations or are they still in the process of announcing their positions?
Despite the differences in the positions of the parties, it should be noted that last week’s talks were held in a professional and explicit atmosphere, and the other sides also expressed their views in an atmosphere away from tension. In general, it can be said that a constructive atmosphere prevailed in the talks, and with the submission of draft texts by the Islamic Republic of Iran, an important and important step forward was taken in the direction of the talks. Of course, as is clear from the name of these documents, we consider the proposed texts to be negotiable drafts and we have also encouraged the other parties to put their clear texts and proposals on the table in accordance with the common principles and within the framework of Barjam.
Although there were discussions on the text during this round of talks, we expect that in the next round of talks, which will begin next weekend, the other side will also provide accurate and logical written answers and possibly new practical ideas in Vienna. Be present. In that case, one can hope that serious negotiations on the texts will begin. The other side needs to have both the interactive approach and the necessary flexibility.
Explain the content of the two documents provided to the other party. Is another document to be submitted by Iran?
As mentioned, the Iranian delegation presented two full drafts to the other side on the third day of the talks. The first draft, which addresses the issue of lifting oppressive and illegal sanctions against Iran, includes US commitments to lift sanctions. One of the points that has been emphasized in the talks with the other side is that all the sanctions imposed within the framework of the policy of maximum pressure are designed with the clear aim of eliminating Borjam, and therefore all these sanctions are related to Borjam. Another document describes the nuclear steps of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the quality of stopping the compensatory steps, if the sanctions are lifted. In this regard, it is emphasized that until the manner of lifting the sanctions is clarified and implemented, the Islamic Republic of Iran can not be expected to stop its compensatory steps, which were not an initial action, but a reaction to the sanctions.
Of course, there are other drafts that our comments will be presented in the form of these drafts. The manner and timing of the verification, the test, and the issue of receiving a guarantee that the United States will not withdraw from the agreement are among the items that will be discussed below. In recent days, we have seen a number of senators and members of Congress threaten that the United States will pull out of the nuclear deal again if a Republican president comes to power. This reflects the deep divisions within the United States and the fact that the United States is not reliable in the negotiations and must provide credible and acceptable guarantees to return to the UN Security Council. They know full well that the Islamic Republic of Iran will not allow the recurrence of the abuses that took place after the signing of the agreement in 2015 to take the Iranian economy hostage again.
Some media reports have suggested that some European delegations have called for a speedy conclusion to this round of talks and a return to the capitals. What was the reason for these countries’ position?
As I mentioned, our impression was that the European parties did not expect the Islamic Republic of Iran to submit its proposals in writing during this round of talks. That is why these countries, immediately after receiving the drafts of the Iranian delegation, demanded that they return to their countries to consult with the capitals and receive new negotiating instructions. The Islamic Republic of Iran had stated that it had sufficient decision-making power and expertise and was ready to continue the talks whenever necessary, but the opposing parties, who needed to consult with their senior officials to continue the talks, demanded that the talks be held. Stop for a few days. Accordingly, the delegations returned to their countries on Friday and are scheduled to resume talks next weekend.
The composition of the Iranian delegation, both in terms of number and composition of individuals, has been covered by the media. Explain how people are selected and how they affect conversations.
One of the issues that was emphasized before this round of talks was that the Islamic Republic should be present in the negotiations with the right decision-making power and expertise to ensure that the texts prepared and the negotiating positions of the delegation are as free as possible. Be a defect. In addition, because the government is serious about reaching a conclusion and is really trying to conclude the talks as soon as possible, it believed that it was necessary to provide the decision-making process on the spot, the process of preparing texts and providing feedback to the other party. Accelerate.
For this reason, in the weeks leading up to the talks, all bodies that are somehow related to the subject of the talks and can assist in decision-making or expert work were contacted so that their nominees could accompany the State Department delegation. To introduce. Eventually, a combination was formed that has a really high potential, both from a managerial and decision-making point of view and from an expert point of view. It should also be noted that in this round of talks, the economic weight of the delegation was much higher than in previous periods, because from the perspective of the Islamic Republic, the issue of lifting sanctions is now the main issue of the negotiations, and as long as this task It is not clear, other issues can not be finalized. Of course, it is clear that this combination will increase during the negotiations and based on low need or even if necessary.
Some opponents of the Vienna talks, including the Israeli prime minister, have called for a halt to the talks, accusing the Islamic Republic of wasting time to buy time and advance its nuclear program. What is your response to this charge?
The accusation of the lack of seriousness and timeliness of the Islamic Republic in the talks, which this time came out of the Zionist trumpet, was something we had been waiting for, but as you can see, the performance of the delegation and the rapid submission of accurate drafts To a large extent, this tactic was thwarted, and it was the other side that demanded the suspension of the talks, while the Iranian delegation was ready to continue the talks without interruption for as long as necessary. It is natural that the Zionist regime is not happy with such a situation. That is why in the same day or two, the Zionist regime’s media tried to make a negative impact on the atmosphere of the talks by fabricating and spreading several rumors.
During our meetings, we warned the other side that some foreign parties who are dissatisfied with the progress of the talks should not be allowed to influence the negotiations by spreading false and distorted news.
Some US officials, including the Secretary of State, have expressed skepticism about the outcome of the talks. What do you think about this?
Contrary to what US officials have said, I believe that an agreement is available if the other parties are in good faith and stop playing useless games of blame. The Islamic Republic of Iran has put pragmatic proposals on the table, and the other parties must respond appropriately or even present their new proposals and ideas in writing and clearly. I think making negative statements and making such statements is more of a negotiation tactic than an attempt by the other side to blame Iran in order to put pressure on the negotiators. It is enough for the opposing parties to exercise political will and declare their readiness to take the necessary practical steps. In that case, the way will be opened for agreement and settlement of disputes.
End of message

The spokesman of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized: The Iranian negotiating team has entered Vienna with serious determination to reach the principles of an agreement. The United States will also come to Vienna with the approach of resolving the deadlocks created in the previous negotiations.

According to ISNA, Saeed Khatibzadeh at the beginning of his press conference in honor of the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian people said: Palestine for We are a flawless ideal.

“The occupying regime in Jerusalem has been violating all international law for decades and is systematically violating the rights of the Palestinian people,” he added.

Condemning the actions of some Arab countries in normalizing their relations with the Zionist regime, he stated: “The Palestinian cause is not an ideal to be forgotten.”

He also celebrated the arrival of Parliament Day.

Saeed Khatibzadeh In response to a question about whether it is possible to hold bilateral talks between the Iranian and American delegations, given that a new round of Vienna talks will begin today, : There will be no bilateral talks with US delegations.

The senior diplomat of our country also in response to a question about the joint note of the British and Israeli foreign ministers in one of the Western media on the eve of the start of a new round of Vienna talks and Iran’s analysis of this action by the London Foreign Minister

He also referred to the proverb and said: They say say you are a friend of Kian to say who you are?

Asked if there had been any new developments in the payment of South Korea’s debts to Iran, the State Department spokesman said: “There has been no new developments in this regard. This field is underway.

He also clarified in response to a question about some published news related to the reactivation of ISIL in Iraq and some efforts to revive it : “Unfortunately, we see some open support and We are hidden to revive ISIS in the region, and what is important to us, and we have emphasized it many times, is to maintain peace and stability in Iraq, and we will not give up any help that we are witnessing a smooth and peaceful transfer of power in Iraq following the recent elections. Be this country.

In response to a question about the latest follow-up on the implementation of the 25-year cooperation document between Iran and China, the Foreign Ministry spokesman said: “The 25-year document on long-term cooperation between Iran and China as a roadmap Cooperation between the two countries has always been pursued and different parts of this roadmap are being pursued between different and related ministries, and projects and agreements in this direction will be finalized.

He continued: “The future visit of our Foreign Minister to China will be in this direction and to finalize parts of these agreements.

Khatibzadeh also said that the Iranian negotiating team has entered Vienna with a serious determination to reach an agreement and is considering outcome-oriented talks.

He stressed: “The Americans should come to Vienna with the approach of removing the deadlocks created in the previous negotiations and lifting and lifting the sanctions imposed on Iran, which they have imposed since 2015 with fake labels.”

This news is completed.

Referring to the beginning of a new round of Vienna talks in the coming days, our Foreign Minister said: “We hope to be able to take fundamental and successful steps forward in the Vienna talks.”

According to ISNA, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian stated that during the last one hundred days of the Borjam discussion, the Vienna talks and the interaction and cooperation in line with the rights and interests of the Iranian people with the IAEA The International Atomic Energy Agency has been seriously considered by the country’s diplomatic apparatus, he said: “From this week, we will key the Vienna talks.” In this context, in recent weeks, my deputy Mr. Bagheri has traveled to the capitals of some European countries, Moscow, as well as to countries in the region and neighboring countries, has established webinars and contacts with Beijing, and has taken measures and consultations in this regard. I have also had detailed talks with the foreign ministers of the member states of the UN Security Council. We have made all the preparations to reach a good and quick agreement. Of course, if the other parties also return to their full obligations. We have explicitly stated our positions and demands in the conversations we have had.

He stressed: “The explicit opinion of the Islamic Republic of Iran is that the rights and interests of the Iranian people should be secured at the negotiating table and sanctions should be lifted.” We hope to take fundamental and successful steps forward in the Vienna talks.

“Certainly, the hand of the Islamic Republic of Iran will not be tied, there are different options in front of us, and we will start with the option of dialogue and negotiations in Vienna,” he said. We are serious in negotiating and reaching an agreement and we hope that the other sides will be serious in practice.

“We have made it clear to the other side that we are a pragmatic and result-oriented government and we hope that this will happen at the Vienna talks,” said Amir Abdullahian.

“Our Foreign Minister also referred to the actions of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to follow up and solve the problems of Iranians abroad,” he said. Assign inside the country with the Secretary of State, and if you visit the new website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, you will see this access. In the coming days, a higher access will be provided on this site to address the concerns of some Iranians living abroad.

He continued in this regard: “Unfortunately, the enemies, the Zionist lobby, the dissident media are trying to create a kind of Iranophobia, especially in the new generation of Iranians abroad.” In the coming days, we will activate a section on the Foreign Ministry website where compatriots abroad can ask if we have a problem with the conscription system or any other issue in order to enter Iran. As the Foreign Minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran, I declare that dear Iranians can travel to the country with peace of mind and can return to their country of residence at any time according to the plan they make.

Addressing Iranians abroad, he added: “We will answer you in this system that you can travel to Iran without any problems, and as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the country’s diplomatic apparatus, it is guaranteed when it gives you an answer.” Be.

He continued: I would like to emphasize here that the number of people who are dual nationals and have been tried for committing a crime in Iran and their crime has been proven is less than the number of fingers on both hands. I can honestly say that if anyone else, even the Foreign Minister himself, committed that crime, he would face the same situation today, while many of them have been pardoned by the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Amir Abdullahian also continued his report on the 100 days of activity of the country’s diplomatic apparatus in the 13th government, citing the developments in Afghanistan as another important issue during this period and said: “We made a large political effort in Iran under the influence of insecurity.” And let’s not fall into the instability that was created in Afghanistan during the transition period, and at the same time think of measures that can control the borders, manage the influx of refugees and have a political solution to the Afghan crisis.

He continued: Holding the second meeting of foreign ministers of Afghanistan’s neighboring countries in Iran was one of the measures that were considered in this regard.

End of message

An international affairs expert said: “We have difficult negotiations ahead on December 29 and it is unlikely that a result will be reached quickly, but the spirit of negotiation is good.

In an interview with ISNA, Hassan Beheshtipour said: “Iran has stated that it is ready to negotiate the lifting of sanctions, and these talks are within the framework of the UN Security Council.” The current and previous governments agreed on this position that Borjam should be implemented within its current framework.
He added that Iran has fulfilled its obligations and confirmed 14 reports of the IAEA, and that it is the American and European parties that did not fulfill their obligations in full, and finally, with the withdrawal of the United States, the fulfillment of all obligations was canceled. Borjam has made it conditional on the United States fulfilling its obligations under Borjam, but the United States has also conditioned its return to Borjam and the fulfillment of its obligations on the fact that Iran must first return to its nuclear obligations. This is a fundamental difference, and there is also disagreement between Iran and the United States over some sanctions, including that Iran wants to verify the lifting of sanctions, while the United States says it can not guarantee a return to sanctions.
Beheshtipour clarified about the content and form of the talks and whether to say the final negotiations or the negotiations for the lifting of sanctions: The important question is what is Iran’s approach? Iran has said that the United States should lift sanctions and we are looking for that. If we negotiate without the lifting of sanctions, we will not enter into negotiations. Of course, this statement is quite logical, but in international relations, logic does not prevail, force plays the first role, and this issue should be considered in advancing this issue.
“If we take steps inside the country to make the sanctions effective, the United States may be willing to ignore the sanctions, but it is wrong to expect all the sanctions to be lifted in these negotiations,” he said. The United States uses sanctions as leverage. The lifting of oil and banking sanctions could be a good start to a new round of talks, with Iran fulfilling some of its commitments.
In response to the question that the lifting of sanctions is possible in one go and he agrees with Iran to reduce its nuclear activities, including 60% enrichment? “I do not think this can be done quickly and at once,” he said. At present, Iran is making three demands, and the United States is saying that Iran must first fulfill its obligations.
Beheshtipour stated: We have difficult negotiations ahead and it is unlikely to reach a result quickly, but the spirit of negotiation is good. Continuing negotiations is a logical and necessary task and should have been done sooner. Wherever we prevent the loss, it is a benefit because the pressure on the people and the country is great. At the same time, given that the United States is indirectly in the negotiations, I anticipate lengthy negotiations.
End of message

The Presidents of Iran and Russia in a telephone conversation, referring to the common positions and convergence of the two countries on bilateral, regional and international issues, stressed the need to finalize a comprehensive document on long-term cooperation.

According to ISNA, سید Ayatollah Seyyed Ibrahim Ra’isi on Tuesday thanked Russian President Vladimir Putin for a phone call and expressed the Islamic Republic of Iran’s will to expand trade relations. “We are ready to finalize a comprehensive document on long-term cooperation between the two countries so that the process of further enhancing relations and cooperation between the two countries can be implemented quickly,” he said.

“Tehran and Moscow have convergence and synergy in many international issues,” he said. “Countering unilateralism and strengthening multilateralism are among the commonalities of the two countries.”

Raisi stressed the need for joint cooperation between the two countries in regional issues, and said: “We consider the continuation of foreign presence in Syria against the will of the Syrian people and government and illegal; Because it threatens the stability and security of this country.

Referring to the developments in Afghanistan, the President said: “We consider the presence of ISIS in Afghanistan dangerous for the region and this country, and we must be aware of the dangers of this conspiracy.”

“The Islamic Republic of Iran wants to establish an inclusive government with the presence of all ethnic groups and political groups, and we believe that the formation of such a government can guarantee the security of this country,” Raisi said.

While appreciating Russia’s position in defense of nuclear rights and the need to lift all sanctions against the Iranian people, Raisi stressed: “The Islamic Republic of Iran is very serious in the negotiations and is equally serious in ensuring the rights of our people to lift the sanctions.” Have.

The President also welcomed Russia’s initiative for stability and calm in the Caucasus region; The two sides also stressed in this telephone conversation: any change in geopolitics and change of borders of the countries in the region is not acceptable.

In this telephone conversation, Raisi also thanked the President and the Russian government for their assistance in Iran’s membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Agreement, as well as in providing the Corona vaccine.

Russian President Vladimir Putin also stressed in his telephone call that Tehran and Moscow have common positions and convergence on many issues. “Moscow supports Tehran’s proposals in drafting a new document on long-term cooperation between the two countries,” he said. And we are determined to finalize and implement it as soon as possible.

Emphasizing that Moscow attaches great importance to improving the level of economic relations and finalizing joint investment programs with Iran, the Russian President said: “We are witnessing positive tendencies for increasing the level of bilateral, regional and international cooperation. The development of collaborations will accelerate.

Referring to the two countries’ cooperation on regional issues, especially Syria, Putin said: “By working together, we were able to preserve Syria’s independence and destroy the terrorist hotspot in this country.” Of course, we must continue our close cooperation, especially in various regional areas.

The Russian President also supported the rights of the Iranian people in the nuclear issue and expressed hope that in the future negotiations, the parties will have sufficient political will to get out of the current situation.

“We are looking for a 3 + 3 consultative mechanism to increase the level of trust and cooperation in the region, and we hope that the Islamic Republic of Iran will support it,” Putin said, expressing concern over the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh.

“Russia is determined to continue cooperating in the fight against Corona and sending vaccine shipments to Iran,” he concluded.

End of message

In an interview with a British newspaper, our Deputy Foreign Minister explained our country’s position on the resumption of talks on reviving the nuclear deal in Vienna and Iran’s goal in these talks. .

“Iran wants a commitment that the United States will make again,” Ali Bagheri, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, who has traveled to Europe for some consultations with his counterparts, was quoted as saying by the Guardian newspaper. It does not leave the nuclear agreement signed by the world powers. Bagheri added: “In the Vienna talks between Iran and the other signatories of the agreement, the parties could not agree on a means of verifying that the US sanctions were lifted and had a pragmatic effect on trade with Iran.” “We need a verification and this issue has not been resolved yet,” said Iran’s political deputy foreign minister. One of the issues that has not been finalized yet is not enough to be mentioned in the agreement alone. He did not rule out the possibility that an independent panel would be responsible for the verification. Defending his demand that the United States guarantee that he would abide by the agreement, our senior diplomat said: “The issue is an agreement, not a policy.” If there is an agreement and peace between the two countries, it will have the effect of a treaty. It is a matter of international law. US domestic law is not going to override an international agreement. This is against international law. Bagheri continued: “He calls on the European powers to guarantee on their own behalf that they will trade with Iran, regardless of the US position;” Possibly through the use of a deterrent law that would neutralize the impact of US sanctions on European shirts trading with Iran. The Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs denied allegations that Iran was struggling to resume the Vienna nuclear talks in an effort to expand its nuclear program, saying it was normal for a new government to take a stand. Prepare negotiations and have bilateral negotiations with other partners. The chief negotiator of the Iranian team in the Vienna talks reiterated his call for the lifting of sanctions related to the nuclear deal. In addition, Bagheri ruled out any negotiations on Iran’s missile and security program and their inclusion in the nuclear deal, saying that the [nuclear deal] has a clear framework and other issues are not related. We do not intend to negotiate our defense or security. He added: Iran’s relations with other countries do not need to be careful. The Deputy Foreign Minister of our country denied the fact that his negotiating position is said to be so stubborn that it is impossible to reach an agreement in Vienna, and explained: “We only say that according to Borjam, sanctions should be lifted.” To be. We made an agreement and our view is that it should be implemented. Asked whether he thought the Vienna talks needed to be resumed from the outset, he said: “It does not matter where we started, but what matters is that we reach an agreement with pragmatic results.” Have for the parties. Our main goal is to lift the illegal sanctions that they imposed on the Iranian nation in violation of UN resolutions. Any anti-Burjam sanctions imposed by both Obama and Trump’s presidency must be lifted. This is the agreement that shaped Burjam. End of message

The spokesman of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated: ‌ The Zionist regime is well aware of the total capabilities of Iran and also knows its limited capabilities, and is aware that Iran is concerned about its security with No one compromises and no one is joking.

According to ISNA, ید Saeed Khatibzadeh in his weekly meeting with local and foreign media on Monday morning in response to a question about the statements of regime officials “We have never ignored the Zionist threat to the stability and security of the region, because the nature of this regime is crisis-creating and its roots are in It creates insecurity. In this regard, it does not provide any safe environment.

Khatibzadeh stated: The Zionist regime is well aware of Iran’s total capabilities. He also knows his limited capabilities and is aware that Iran does not compromise with any side on its security and is not joking. We do not ignore and pay attention to the threat of the occupying regime in Jerusalem to stabilize the security of the region.

He added: “Such issues have been answered in their place and will be answered if necessary.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also responded to a question about the Iran-Saudi talks and whether the talks will lead to the reopening of the two countries’ embassies in Tehran and Riyadh, and when that will be. “What I said in an interview with one of the country’s news agencies was that we are far from reopening the embassies of the two countries and it is too early to talk about it now,” he said.

He continued: “The Tehran-Riyadh talks in Baghdad are the beginning of a process that the end of this process can end, of course, all of which is conditional on Riyadh’s serious commitment to effective action.”

Khatibzadeh also clarified at the meeting, which lasted about an hour, in response to another question about some of the proposals for bilateral talks between Iran and the United States in a third country: There has been no dialogue between Iran and the United States for a long time. There has been no direct or indirect contact or communication since the US unilateral and illegal withdrawal from the UN Security Council.

The State Department spokesman continued: “The United States, as a violator of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, has unilaterally withdrawn from the Security Council and has been working to eliminate it.” It has imposed cruel and extraterritorial sanctions on the Iranian people and tried to obstruct Iran’s normal trade and economic relations with various countries. Has also punished.

He added: “Until these facts change on the ground, it is not imagined that there will be any contact between Tehran and Washington in any form and format.

The State Department spokesman went on to answer another question that Iran has stated that the United States must guarantee to stay in the UN Security Council so that it does not unilaterally withdraw from the agreement like in the Trump era, and Iran objectively “What assurances does the United States seek in this regard?” He said. >

Khatibzadeh continued: “The essence of this is that Iran and the P5 + 1 countries emphasize that the United States must show its intention in action by providing assurances that no one in Washington will leave unilaterally.” He does not ridicule the world for agreements. What Trump did by illegally withdrawing from Burjam was not just mocking the other parties in Burjam, but in a way mocking international law and international mechanisms. There has been debate about what kind of political and legal guarantees the United States should provide to be included in the UN Security Council. The United States seeks to advance its goals beyond any guarantee, and assumes that it is the police of the world, and that it can break the rules at any time. In the case of Barjam, we will not allow our economy and sectors of the economy that once survived that shock to be in a state of doubt again. We will only accept the return of the United States to Burjam if we are sure that this return is certain.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs continued his conversation with reporters regarding the meeting of the group of hypocrites in Washington and the speeches of some people in this meeting : The bankrupt group of hypocrites in some countries and meeting places And it is even more unfortunate that with money some officials encourage countries to speak at the event.

He added: “No one takes these meetings seriously, nor do the people who speak in these meetings by discrediting themselves.”

Khatibzadeh stated that the expiration date of this group has expired for their masters and sometimes they abuse them against the Iranian people, and specified: “Any member of this group who repents and returns to the people will experience a normal life.”

“The relations between Iran and the IAEA are technical and professional,” said the senior diplomat of our country, regarding the request and emphasis of Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, to meet with our Minister of Foreign Affairs, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian. / p>

He added that the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran has a very regular and precise relationship with the IAEA. It has been in essence.

A State Department spokesman added: “If a trip is arranged and a meeting is arranged if necessary, this issue will be arranged and put on the agenda.

Khatibzadeh continued: “If the Atomic Energy Organization finalizes the program and it is in accordance with the plan, this meeting will take place and there is no ban for this meeting and there will not be.”

Foreign Ministry Spokesman Continued his conversation with reporters in response to a question about the Iranian border from Helmand and whether there were talks between Tehran and the Taliban on this issue and the Taliban based this agreement on the existence of Recognizes or not, گفت said: ‌ What is known as the Helmand Agreement dates back to 1351 and these cases will never change with the arrival and departure of governments and governing bodies in countries.

“For many years, the Afghan parties have not complied with some of their obligations under this agreement, especially under Article 3,” the senior diplomat said. The institution responsible for the implementation of this contract is the High Commissioner of Water of the two countries, which is the responsibility of the Ministry of Energy on behalf of Iran, and this issue has always been followed up by this ministry.

Khatibzadeh added: “The ruling board of the interim governor of Afghanistan (Taliban) is as committed to this issue as the government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and previous governments in this country, and it is important that these are implemented and this issue will be followed up in contacts and consultations.” شد. P>

Our Foreign Ministry spokesman also spoke at the meeting about the Iran-Saudi talks and the recent crisis between Beirut and Riyadh. Saudi Foreign Ministry officials blamed Hezbollah, one of Iran’s main allies in the region, for the problems in Lebanon. “Our talks with Saudi Arabia are about bilateral and regional issues, and we do not talk to anyone about our friends,” he said. And in fact, our friends are not the subject of our conversation with anyone. We have always been with our friends.

Khatibzadeh continued: ‌ The Riyadh government knows that the policy of pressure and siege against other countries has long since lost its effect. We stand by the Yemeni people and our friends.

The senior diplomat of our country pointed out: The talks between Iran and Saudi Arabia in Baghdad were serious talks, ‌ the issues were clearly stated between the two sides and where we should reach is conditional and focused on serious actions by the other side. It is free from mere media statements.

“In response to the claims of some countries in the Persian Gulf about the Iranian islands in the region,” the Foreign Ministry spokesman told reporters “Iran’s position in this regard is unchanged and these Iranian islands in The Persian Gulf has always been and will always be Persian.

“But we are a patient neighbor and we have always shown this,” he said. The disintegration of the country showed that we do not cross even one inch of our land.

The State Department spokesman also condemned the instrumental and political use of human rights as part of the meeting , adding: “The worst view of human rights is to have a political and instrumental view of the issue.” p>

A State Department spokesman also said in response to another question about some of the US officials’ stances on Iran: “The Americans themselves know best that the only option for them is to abide by the rule of law and respect.” It is the right of nations. Iran is confident in its security and military capabilities, and other parties are aware of Iran’s capabilities, and they would rather not fall into the trap of the literature and logic of some militants and extremists in Washington, rather than some flattering statements. Stay away from this kind of literature, and the government must show in practice that it is dealing with international issues with a new logic.

“I have not seen Mr. Ulyanov’s tweet about the timing of the start of the Vienna talks and Mr. Bagheri’s remarks in this regard,” he said. I will not comment on that. Iran and the European Union, as coordinators of the UN Security Council in Brussels, are approaching the date of the first new round of talks in Vienna, which will take place before the end of November. Of course, the final date will be announced this week after consulting with the other P4 + 1 countries, a date that is suitable for all parties.

Khatibzadeh also said in response to the question whether the Vienna talks will be held at the level of foreign ministers or at the level of deputies: “There is no issue at the level of foreign ministers and these talks are the same as in the past.” The level of deputies will be followed. Different issues should be raised. The talks will begin soon in the next two to three weeks and will be pursued with more focus and energy. Iran does not seek to negotiate. We are looking for outcome-oriented negotiations, and the preconditions for these negotiations are that these negotiations will break the deadlock in Vienna, but there will be difficult conditions if the United States wants to continue as before.

Khatibzadeh also announced at the meeting that a meeting of Iranian ambassadors to neighboring countries will be held in Tehran in the next two weeks.

“In response to ISNA’s question about the situation of Iranians trapped on the border with Belarus and the latest follow-up by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in this regard,” our Foreign Ministry spokesman said. Dear compatriots. Unfortunately, some of our compatriots are trapped by fraudulent groups and leave the country illegally, with deceptive promises and at exorbitant costs, through these gangs, and over 90% of them never reach the destination of their choice. We advise our compatriots to use legal and normal routes to travel to their destination country so that they do not fall into the trap of these groups, who never care about the fate of the people who are with them.

“As soon as we found out that some of our compatriots were stranded on the Belarusian-Lithuanian-Polish border, we started to help them, although it was very difficult to find their geographical location in this cold weather and difficult route,” he said. . During the follow-up, we were able to return three of our citizens to the country. Some of these citizens do not know where their geographical location is, because the route is difficult and complicated. We have told the Belarusian government that given the good relations between the two countries, we expect maximum cooperation to solve the problems of these citizens. We have had reports of very bad treatment of these citizens. We have raised these issues in meetings with Belarusian officials in the Belarusian capital, and the Belarusian side has received some reports directly in this regard.

Khatibzadeh continued: We will follow this issue until the last moment. Of course, the process of following this issue is not a one-day process, it has its own complexities, and we hope that the attention and awareness of our people will increase so that they do not use and travel these routes.

A State Department spokesman also told a questioning reporter about the remarks made by Jake Sullivan, a senior US official, that we are ready to return to talks in good faith with Iran: ‌ I hope what you You quoted Mr. Sullivan as saying, “It is true, but unfortunately what has been done so far and the actions and plans pursued by Mr. Biden’s government are contrary to the intention that Mr. Sullivan has announced.” We have heard enough words during this time and we are waiting for an action that has been delayed for a long time.

He also answered the question about the air patrols of Saudi, Israeli, American and Zionist fighters in the region yesterday and Iran’s view of this kind of behavior : “We carefully and in detail the issues We followed up and we do. In our opinion, these threatening actions were a colorless and odorless show and are not worth paying more attention to.

“Our talks in Vienna will begin before the end of November,” Khatibzadeh said, referring to Iran’s expectations of China’s role in the Vienna talks. We and Beijing have very close consultations, and in Brussels the date for the start of negotiations was not final because Iran wanted to consult with all parties, including Beijing, and the date will be finalized soon.

Foreign Ministry Spokesman In response to another question from ISNA, regarding the return of Mr. Gharibabadi to Tehran, whether the new representative of Iran in the International Atomic Energy Agency has been determined or not, said: “Currently, the Iranian delegation In the Agency, Mr. Ghaedi carries out his activities. The activities are carried out regularly and there is no problem in this regard. The process of introducing Iran’s new representative in Vienna is underway. As mentioned earlier, this week we will set the date for the start of a new round of talks in Vienna with the Coordinating Committee of the Joint Commission and announce it to the other parties, and in the process we will work to finalize the process as soon as possible.

He commented on the news that South Korea had donated 2,000 masks to a hospital in Tehran, and whether the news was humorous and what Iran thought of the news and South Korea’s action. : Is not humor.

In response to the same reporter, Khatibzadeh said: “Of course, let us keep this issue as a joke.” The people of South Korea have shown in various places that they are somewhat dissatisfied with what the Korean government has shown to Iran, and we feel this on various issues.

“We have tried to separate issues related to the actions and policies of the Korean government in relation to Iran’s blocked currencies in Korea from some other issues in order to have the least impact on relations between the two countries,” the State Department spokesman said. p>

He continued: I think no nation can stand in the hands of another country and nation. This money belongs to the Iranian nation, it must be returned to the Iranian people. Efforts have been made, but not enough. At the State Department, we have contacts with the central bank as well as the Korean side. There is a will in this field, but it has not been realized, and we must try to achieve this.

Khatibzadeh also said about the time of the Indian Foreign Minister’s visit to Tehran : ‌ The timing of this visit is on the agenda and we will announce it as soon as it is finalized.

Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Jiang Yu’s Regular Press Conference on Questions and Answers “If we are at this point today on the issue of Burjam, the US Secretary of State should not be forgotten, which is due to the arrogance of the United States and the violation of regulations by this country,” he said. The United States withdrew from the UN Security Council in violation of international law, including UN Security Council Resolution 2231.

He added: ‌Currently, the relationship between the United States and the UN Security Council is the ratio of a country that has withdrawn from an illegal international agreement in terms of international law and has politically tried to destroy this international agreement, and economically it is trying to It was intended to turn the dollar into a weapon against this agreement.

“If the US foreign policy system has Alzheimer’s disease, they need to be repeatedly told who came out of the deal and reminded them of these issues,” he said.

He also said about this part of the US Secretary of State’s speech that we are pursuing the necessary and other options against Iran, he said: Unaware that other options are on the table, the United States knows what the options are, as it has already tried in Afghanistan.

Khatibzadeh added: “American officials should try to create new literature and logic instead of falling into the trap of extremist literature and logic, and not try to preserve Trump’s legacy, and they should know that the international community is doing the right thing by Will embrace openly.

The State Department spokesman also said in response to another question about the recent statement by the US, French, German and British leaders on Iran and the nuclear talks and their concerns about Iran’s nuclear progress: سه کشور اروپایی و هم آمریکا به خوبی می‌دانند که وضعیت فعلی به دلیل بی عملی و فرار آن‌ها از انجام تعهدات‌شان به همراه نقض آشکار قطعنامه ۲۲۳۱ شورای امنیت سازمان ملل و برجام است.

وی با اشاره به بی‌عملی اروپایی‌ها در برابر اجرای تعهداتشان در برجام گفت:‌ آن‌ها نمی‌توانند تاریخ را از سر بنویسند. توصیه می‌کنیم به جای اینکه دور هم جمع بشوند و گعده‌های دوستانه بگیرند و حرف‌هایی بزنند که وقتی از خواب بیدار می‌شوند خودشان نیز باورشان نمی‌شود برای راهکارهایی فکر کنند که چگونه می‌توانند به عنوان دولت‌های مسئول به تعهداتشان عمل کنند.

خطیب زاده با بیان اینکه سه کشور اروپایی آلمان، فرانسه و انگلیس تاکنون به هیچ کدام از تعهدات‌شان بعد از خروج آمریکا از برجام عمل نکرده‌اند،‌ گفت:‌ آن‌ها ثابت کردند که بیش از آنکه پایتخت‌های آن‌ها در موضوعات حقوق بین‌الملل مهم باشد این دولت واشنگتن است که در روابط فراآتلانتیک برای آن‌ها تعیین تکلیف می‌کند.

سخنگوی وزارت خارجه با تأکید بر اینکه این کشورهای اروپایی باید از بی‌عملی خارج شوند و خودشان به عنوان کنشگر مسئول و فعال در برابر اجرای تعهداتشان عمل کنند در بخش دیگری از صحبت‌های خود در مورد بیانیه مورد اشاره تأکید کرد:‌ هیچ وقت ایران به دنبال سلاح‌های کشتار جمعی نبوده است و هیچ‌ گاه در دکترین امنیتی و دفاعی ایران این موضوع قرار نداشته است و ایران همواره بر خلع سلاح سراسری در جهان تأکید داشته است.

وی با اشاره به استفاده آمریکا از بمب اتم علیه دیگر کشورها در مقطعی از تاریخ گفت:‌ آمریکا به عنوان تنها کشوری که این جسارت بی‌شرمانه را کرده که از بمب اتم بر علیه ملتی دیگر استفاده کند باید بپذیرد که خلع سلاح شود و همچنین دیگر کشورهای دارنده سلاح هسته‌ای در جایگاهی نیستند که در خصوص برنامه‌های صلح آمیز هسته‌ای کشور دیگر از جمله ایران صحبت کنند.

خطیب زاده در ادامه در پاسخ به سوال مطرح شده به روابط ایران و آژانس اشاره کرد و افزود:‌ایران در چارچوب پادمان روابط خودش را با آژانس بین‌المللی انرژی اتمی پیگیری کرده و در چارچوب NPT به تعهدات خود عمل کرده است. اجرای تمامی تعهدات فراپادمانی به دلیل نقض برجام از سوی طرف‌های دیگر و خروج آمریکا از این توافق بین‌المللی با اعلام رسمی به آژانس متوقف شده و از روزی که اجرای پروتکل الحاقی متوقف شده ایران رسما اعلام کرده که تنها و صرفا براساس نیازهای برنامه صلح آمیز هسته‌ای اقدامات خود در این زمینه را به پیش می‌برد و نه هیچ چیز دیگری فراتر از پادمان.

وی تصریح کرد:‌ سطح غنی سازی ایران، میزان آن و اورانیوم فلزی همه براساس اهداف و برنامه صلح آمیز ایران و با مصارف کاملا مشخص و با اعلام به آژانس انجام شده است و آنچه که در طرف مقابل اتفاق می‌افتد قابل قبول نیست و هیچ گاه پذیرفته نمی‌شود که آن‌ها موضوعات طبیعی را به یک موضوع تبدیل کنند.

خطیب زاده همچنین با ارائه توضیحاتی در مورد اهداف سفر علی باقری معاون سیاسی وزیر خارجه به بروکسل گفت:‌ سفر آقای باقری به بروکسل برای این بود که اولا روشن شود که چرا آمریکا شش دور گفت‌وگوهای دقیق و و رو به جلو وین را به بن بست کشاند و چرا با رویکرد یک جانبه‌اش اجازه نداد آنچه که باید در اجرای برجام نعل به نعل اجرایی شود،‌عملیاتی شود و اینکه چگونه می‌شود از بن بست پیش آمده خارج شد.

وی ادامه داد:‌ اگر آمریکا روزی که به مذاکرات وین می‌آید با برنامه اجرایی درست به وین بیاید و سیاست قبلی خودش مبنی بر حفظ بخشی از تحریم‌های ترامپ علیه ایران را کنار بگذارد و انرژی و وقت مجموعه ۱+۴ و ایران را با استدلال‌های بی سروته برای نگه داشتن بخشی از تحریم‌ها تلف نکند. همه مطمئن باشند که توافق برای چگونگی بازگشت آمریکا به برجام و رفع یک جا و موثر همه تحریم‌ها به سرعت می‌تواند اتفاق بیفتد.

خطیب زاده تأکید کرد:‌ ما منتظر اقدام و عمل دولت واشنگتن هستیم.

سخنگوی وزارت خارجه در مورد اظهارات اخیر جک سالیوان در ارتباط با موضوع خروج از برجام و موضع ایران در مورد مذاکرات وین افزود: آقای سالیوان در دوره اوباما یکی از مذاکره‌کنندگان بوده است و برخی از صحبت‌های او، ما را در مورد نیات دولت فعلی آمریکا به تردید می‌اندازد. اگر این‌ها از مقامات دولت ترامپ می‌شنیدیم می‌گفتیم نمی‌دانند و به آن‌ها اشتباه گزارش شده و نیت به هم زدن موضوع را دارند ولی وقتی این جملات را از این‌ها می‌شنویم می‌گوییم این‌ها نشان می‌دهد که آن‌ها در بیان هم صداقت ندارند و نیات درستی هم ندارند. قطعا انگلیسی آقای سالیوان خوب است و می‌داند که Left به چه معناست و آن کسی که از برجام Left داد آمریکا بود. ایران و ۱+۴ عضو برجام هستند و ما به دولت واشنگتن توصیه می‌کنیم در مسیر بازگشت‌اش به این توافق بین‌المللی به برجام توجه و تمرکز کند.

وی همچنین در مورد تحریم‌های اخیر آمریکا علیه تعدادی از اشخاص حقیقی و حقوقی ایران گفت:‌ اگر فقط یک دلیل بخواهیم برای رسانه‌ها بگوییم برای اینکه چرا به گفت‌وگوهای وین به نتیجه نرسید همین اظهارات متناقض مقامات آمریکا و اقدامات  دوگانه‌ای است که انجام می‌دهند. آن‌ها از یک طرف تلاش می‌کنند که میراث ترامپ را حفظ کنند و فشار حداکثری اعمال می‌کنند و از طرف دیگر صحبت‌های دیگری را بیان می‌کنند و این‌ها همه نشان می‌دهد که ما با چه شرایطی روبرو هستیم.

خطیب زاده ادامه داد: ‌دولت واشنگتن در وین به صورت مشخص گفت‌وگوها را به پیچیدگی‌هایی رساند که باعث ایجاد بن بست شد.

سخنگوی وزارت خارجه ادامه داد: رفع تحریم‌های فراسرزمینی و غیرقانونی آمریکا ضمن اینکه دارای جزئیات است ولی این همه پیچیدگی، موخره، مقدمه و زمینه لازم نداشت. آوردن لیست قرمز، زرد و سبز و کارهای نمایشی دیگر لازم نداشت. منطق روشن است، باید از پیچیدگی کم کرد و به صورت موثر تحریم‌ها را رفع کرد و ضمانت برای اجرای موثر برجام وجود داشته باشد و منافع اقتصادی ایران از برجام به صورت جدی احیا شود.

خطیب زاده با اشاره به برگزاری دومین نشست وزیران امور خارجه کشورهای همسایه افغانستان در تهران گفت : در پایان این نشست بیانیه ای منتشر شد که آن یکی از دستاوردهای نشست تهران بود.

 وی همچنین گفت: چین، میزبان سومین نشست وزیران امور خارجه کشورهای همسایه افغانستان خواهد بود.

وی در ابتدای این نشست فرا رسیدن ۱۳ آبان را نیز گرامی داشت.

انتهای پیام

The spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of our country announced: The meeting of the foreign ministers of the neighboring countries of Afghanistan will be held next Wednesday in Tehran.

According to ISNA, Saeed Khatibzadeh in an interview with reporters on Monday morning in response to a question about the talks between Mr. Bagheri and Mr. Enrique Mora A high-ranking EU official said: “Last Thursday’s talks were good and constructive, and the points that Iran should have said to the coordinator of the talks were conveyed, and the two sides agreed that these talks would continue in the coming days in Brussels.” Slowly This was a bilateral agreement.

He continued: “The challenges and obstacles that led to the failure of the six rounds of the Vienna talks will be discussed in these talks and should be discussed in the consultations.”

Khatibzadeh said: ‌ Let these talks continue on their way and I am sure that Mr. Bagheri will express his views in this regard soon.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also said in response to another question about the Iran-Saudi talks and some of the statements made by the Saudi Foreign Minister in this regard: “Talks between Iran and Saudi Arabia” It has been in a friendly and positive atmosphere and bilateral issues and the region have been consulted and discussed. The points that should have been raised have been discussed and consulted between the delegations of the two countries. These conversations and contacts are ongoing.

He continued: “The only thing I can say about these talks is that these talks are respectful and just as serious, and we hope that they will come to fruition, and we must allow these talks to continue on their path and channel. To conclude.

Khatibzadeh also in response to another question regarding some news that a delegation from Saudi Arabia has traveled to Tehran or that Saudi Arabia has asked Iran to take action on the issue of Yemen and prevent Ansarullah from advancing. “Let what is happening at the negotiating table between Iran and Saudi Arabia go its own way,” he said. Space to move forward at the negotiating table. I can tell you that what is being said about these conversations in some media outlets is media speculation, and I will not comment on them.

He also said that the published news about the visit of a Saudi delegation to Tehran has not been confirmed.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also said in response to a question about the statements of the President of Azerbaijan against Iran, including the issue of drug trafficking : ‌ Our advice to our brothers in Azerbaijan is that before addressing Allow media statements to allow talks between officials of the two countries to continue through diplomatic channels. They have sent good, constructive, fraternal messages through diplomatic channels, and these talks should be allowed to continue in this direction.

He continued: “It may be clear what is the purpose of some media statements made by the Azerbaijani authorities.” Of course, I do not read the intentions and we advise the Azerbaijani authorities to keep their word and not allow third parties to trap them.

“Our relations between Iran and Azerbaijan are a very natural one,” he said.

The spokesman of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated: The tenth round of political talks between Iran and South Africa will be held in Tehran.

The spokesman of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs also in response to the question that according to the agreement of the permanent members of Shanghai for Iran’s membership in the Shanghai Summit, what are the latest follow-ups in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to make preparations for this issue? He said that the Secretariat of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is following up on this issue and is preparing the necessary documents in this regard. The final stages of this membership must be completed, which must be done with the cooperation of the parliament, and I think that we have a process in the next few months to complete this technical and executive process.

He also said about some of the invitations made for Iran to attend some of the Shanghai meetings at different levels : ‌ Invitations have been made for the next meetings and we will decide where these meetings will take place. Let’s participate superficially.

Khatibzadeh also responded to another question about the State Department’s latest follow-up on the case of Iranian diplomats abducted in Lebanon 39 years ago and whether the case is still being pursued by the State Department. ‌ stated: ‌ Investigations and follow-ups on the case of these missing diplomats have never stopped at the State Department. Despite the various reports we have received about these dear diplomats, we have never stopped pursuing in this regard. We have followed the consultations on the situation of these dear diplomats in different ways and through different countries. Sometimes we come across clues that, of course, were not true, and we have re-examined and followed up from the beginning.

He said: “The case of these missing diplomats continues as living Iranian diplomats in the Foreign Ministry and we have never stopped pursuing their case.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also responded to another question regarding the 25-year agreement between Iran and China and the latest follow-up of this case by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and some published news that Mr. Larijani is responsible for this case. Another person has been assigned, ‌ said: “The 25-year agreement is a roadmap for joint strategic cooperation between Iran and China, which has different areas and different agencies and ministries are related to it.” Mr. Amir Abdullahian had an assessment of the implementation process of this agreement when he arrived at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and he also raised this issue in the government meeting, and the necessary items have been sent to the relevant agencies with a new look.

He continued: ‌ This agreement is a matter of sovereignty that is being pursued throughout the sovereignty.

Khatibzadeh also told the questioning reporter about the change of the person in charge of this case: ‌ Let this case be followed in the national space and continue its process.

In response to another question about Iran-Egypt relations, the Foreign Ministry spokesman said: “Relations between the two countries are being followed up to the level of the activities of the advocacy offices in Tehran and Cairo.” On the sidelines of the Baghdad meeting, a brief conversation took place between the Iranian Foreign Minister and the President of Egypt, and we hope that these relations will expand within the framework of the ongoing talks, because this issue is in the interest of the whole region.

Regarding the activities of business associates in Iranian embassies abroad, he said: “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is ready to facilitate the presence of business associates, and this is an issue that the Ministry of Silence should take executive and operational measures on.” Be.

Khatibzadeh also said about the visit of General Bagheri, Chief of General Staff of the Armed Forces to Pakistan : ‌ This visit was made at the invitation of the Chief of Army of Pakistan and within the framework of friendly relations between the two countries.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also pointed out the importance of good neighborliness and neighborliness policy between the two countries and said: ‌ These exchanges and consultations are carried out within this framework and our basic principle is that the neighbors’ meeting Iran’s focus should continue. The trip was a successful one and there were good talks and consultations between the officials of the two countries.

Khatibzadeh also said in response to another question about the meeting of foreign ministers of Afghanistan’s neighboring countries in Iran: “Next Wednesday, the meeting of foreign ministers of Afghanistan’s neighboring countries will be held in person in Tehran.”

He continued: ‌ This meeting will be one day and the agenda of the Tehran meeting is to continue the consultations of the previous meeting, which was held virtually. In fact, Afghanistan’s neighbors will focus on how they can help build an inclusive government in Afghanistan that will lead to peace and stability in the country.

“Russia will also be present at this meeting,” he said

The Foreign Ministry spokesman also announced that Iran will attend the Russia-Afghanistan summit as a special envoy.

Khatibzadeh also responded to another question about some of the remarks made about the Iran-EU talks and the continuation of those talks in Brussels, and the remarks made by the Russian representative to international organizations in Vienna, Ulianov, about the talks. He said: “Talks between Iran and the European Union have taken place as a coordinator of the Borjam talks, and these talks are scheduled to continue in the coming days in Brussels.” We must allow these negotiations to continue on their way, and in the future we will move on to a point and a path that we will discuss in more detail.

“Iran is consulting with its partners on a regular basis, and we are hearing Russia’s position from Moscow,” he said.

Khatibzadeh also answered the question about the parliamentary elections in Iraq and related developments : ‌ We welcome the holding of elections in Iraq. What is happening in Iraq is about the parties, the government and the people of Iraq, and what is happening in Iran is the reception of elections and the establishment of a democratic government in this country.

He also in response to an ISNA reporter’s question about the news about the election of a special envoy by the President for Afghanistan and whether the election of this envoy means that the case of Afghanistan from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the presidency “The issue of Afghanistan is a national issue and has always been pursued nationally, and the State Department as a The governing body has the same approach and the same approach continues. What is important for us about Afghanistan is that all relevant institutions and departments take this issue forward with a special coordination and harmony, and the State Department, as the regulator of foreign relations, plays an important role in national affairs.

“What is important for us is the realization of peace and stability in Afghanistan,” the State Department spokesman added.

In response to another question about Iran’s diplomacy in relation to Azerbaijan and the holding of exercises by this country , he stated: ‌ Exercises conducted in the region and by different countries are a natural thing and The important point in this regard is to inform the neighboring countries and the region by the host countries. We informed our neighboring countries when we wanted to conduct exercises in the northwestern borders of the country, and this shows the maturity of the countries if they take such a positive attitude.

Khatibzadeh continued: “Apart from the issue of training, an important issue in this regard is the insecurity that is rooted in the illegitimate presence of the Zionist regime in the region.” All countries in the region should follow this issue more closely. The essence of the Zionist regime is violence and terror, and it has created insecurity wherever it is present. We have friendly and through various channels announced to our neighbors that Iran does not tolerate the illegitimate presence of the Zionist regime near its borders and is not joking with anyone in this regard.

He also in response to a question regarding whether, according to Mr. Amir Abdullahian’s remarks that the United States should take practical action to demonstrate its goodwill to lift sanctions against Iran before the Vienna talks, and whether these remarks “We have not set any preconditions for the talks, and as for the United States, we do not receive a message from the media and consider it as the main message,” he said. We do not receive or send messages to anyone in this way. What Mr. Amir-Abdollahian put forward is a statement of logic, and in fact they emphasized that the current US administration, despite some slogans and comments, has not made any practical changes in its policies compared to the previous US administration. The previous government of this country is no different, so action is important for us.

“The Americans could have stopped many of their atrocities against Iran long ago, but they almost did not, and they continued to do so amid the spread of the Corona virus,” he said.

The spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of our country also in response to a question regarding the relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia and some published news about the increase in the volume of trade and trade exchanges between the two countries added: روابط Regarding the relations Saudi Arabia must allow the talks and consultations between the two countries to reach a point that can be announced, but we are not at that point, and what has been said here in this regard is a repetition.

Khatibzadeh also in response to another question that a Russian bank and an Iranian bank are said to be looking to launch a Swift-like system and whether it is possible to open an alley between the two countries, “The United States has become a military tool against all countries, not just Iran,” he said. In fact, the dollar has become a weapon and tool of mass murder in the international monetary and financial system. US extraterritorial sanctions on everyone, including Europeans, have shown that the dollar has become a weapon by which the United States beheads everyone. It was in this context that various countries began to consider themselves independent of the dollar. In this context, some countries have entered into financial and monetary unions that are separate from the dollar.

He continued: ‌ There is a will that some countries will continue their work and activities with a system independent of the dollar.

Foreign Ministry Spokesman In response to another question regarding Iran-Saudi relations and some Saudi actions against Iran said: ایران Iran’s friendship not now but always towards neighboring and friendly countries Saudi Arabia’s statement has been long, but this does not mean that we have closed our eyes to Saudi actions in Yemen or our eyes to the actions taken by Saudi Arabia so that the Barjam talks would not be concluded.

He continued: “We are looking for a relationship based on mutual understanding and the promotion of relations between the two countries towards greater convergence, because we believe that this issue is in the interest of the two countries, the region and the Islamic world.”

Khatibzadeh In response to another question about the comprehensive cooperation between Iran and Russia and the signing of a document between Tehran and Moscow, such as the document signed between Iran and China, stated: ‌ An agreement between Iran and Russia In 1379, regarding the cooperation between the two countries, it was signed that this agreement was for 10 years and was extended every five years with the consent of both parties, and this contract was extended in April of this year.

He continued: ‌ During Mr. Amir Abdullahian’s visit to Moscow, what was discussed was seriously discussed and the text should be finalized in Tehran, and when it is finalized and we obtain the permission for negotiations, the diplomatic apparatus will draft a comprehensive document. Will cooperate strategically with Russia.

State Department spokesman at the press conference, which lasted about 60 minutes in response to another question as to why the Brussels talks are to be held instead of the Vienna talks and the impact of sanctions and market-related issues Iran’s economy noted: “Our financial market absorbed all the shocks caused by Trump’s unilateral withdrawal from Borjam.” Some people thought that Trump’s unilateral withdrawal from the UN Security Council in 2013 and the shock it caused would lead to the collapse of the Iranian economic system, but I can bring you dozens of independent reports from the world’s think tanks that the Iranian economic system not only hardly and shockingly Management was able to absorb, but this year we will also experience a positive GDP (GDP).

Khatibzadeh said that they should know that Iran’s economic system is much more resilient than these words, as we saw at the height of the corona and the maximum pressures, our trade and economic relations with various countries were not cut off and Iran’s oil exports continued. >

He continued: “What is important is that the interests of the Iranian people are served, and if the interests of the Iranian people are served, we will not waste a second and an hour for purposeful talks, and our recent talks with Mr. Enrique Mora have been in that direction.” Is.

“In response to another question regarding the recent bombings of Shiite mosques in Afghanistan and the insecurity in the neighboring country,” the Foreign Ministry spokesman told reporters: “We are with all parties in We are in contact with Afghanistan, including the Taliban. What is certain is that the Taliban have a direct and special responsibility for building peace, stability and tranquility in Afghanistan and maintaining the health of all groups and minorities in Afghanistan, including Hazaras and Shiites.

“We have heard from the Taliban and other groups in Afghanistan that they are doing their best to prevent such crimes from happening again,” he said, noting that Iran is following developments in Afghanistan with particular sensitivity, including recent issues. >

“We are in contact through diplomacy with various groups in Afghanistan, including the Taliban, and we are trying to prevent Afghanistan from entering the cycle of violence and terror, because the Afghan people are tired of war, terror and violence, and the international community must,” he said. There will be a serious response to the escalation of violence in Afghanistan and we hope that Afghanistan will be free of violence and terror in the future.

Khatibzadeh also clarified in response to another question related to the Borjam negotiations : ‌ The negotiation case will be followed up at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and will be done with a new composition. As I said before, Dr. Bagheri will continue his talks with Mr. Mora in Brussels last week and will continue his consultations on the talks he held in Tehran and the remaining issues.

He stressed that what the president and the foreign minister had said was that negotiations would continue and that a final decision would be made within that framework. The decision-making process in this regard has been concluded and we are now examining the challenges that have arisen in the six rounds of the Vienna talks.

سخنگوی وزارت خارجه همچنین تأکید کرد: ما هیچ وقت پیش شرطی برای آمریکا تعیین نکرده‌ایم چرا که آمریکا عضو برجام نیست و آنچه که گفته‌ایم مربوط به برگشت آمریکا به برجام است و مربوط به بازگشت آمریکا به تعهداتش ذیل برجام و قطعنامه ۲۲۳۱ شورای امنیت سازمان ملل است. هدف اصلی اطمینان از برداشته شدن همه تحریم‌ها و گرفتن تضمین در این زمینه است تا واشنگتن بار دیگر دنیا را به سخره نگیرد تا هدف‌مان از انجام گفت‌وگوهای عمل‌گرا محقق شود.

وی در مورد صحبت‌های امیرعبداللهیان در ارتباط با اینکه آمریکا اقدام عملی پیش از مذاکرات انجام دهد، گفت:‌ آنچه که آقای امیرعبداللهیان مطرح کردند این بود که دولت آمریکا می‌توانست به جای ادامه دادن راه ترامپ روند مجزایی را پیگیری کند اما این کار را نکرد. همچنان فشار حداکثری ترامپ علیه ایران را دنبال می‌کند.

خطیب زاده گفت:‌ با کلام، نیت مشخص نمی‌شود و این اقدام و عمل است که می‌تواند نشان دهد که تغییرات صورت گرفته ولی ما آنچه که می‌بینیم ادامه مسیر گذشته است.

به گزارش ایسنا،‌ سخنگوی وزارت خارجه همچنین در ادامه این نشست فرا رسیدن هفته وحدت را تبریک گفت و گزارشی از عملکرد وزارت خارجه در طول یک هفته گذشته ارائه کرد.

وی همچنین گفت:‌ امروز در تهران میزبان وزیر خارجه ونزوئلا هستیم.

انتهای پیام