دسته: اخبار سیاسی

اخبار سیاسی |

A spokesman for the judiciary said: “Valiullah Seif was sentenced to 10 years in prison, Ahmad Araghchi to 8 years and Salar Aghakhani to 13 years in prison.”

According to ISNA, the Judiciary Media Center announced: The verdict in the case of Seif, the then head of the Central Bank, Ahmad Araghchi and Salar Agakhani, regarding the disturbance of order and tranquility The country’s foreign exchange market and economic climate, as well as some mismanagement, were exported

How the mismanagement of Saif and the Iraqi led to the disruption of the foreign exchange market

Since mid-1996, when the signs of currency market fluctuations became apparent, Ahmad Araghchi, the then newly appointed Deputy Foreign Minister of the Central Bank, with the coordination of the Governor of the Central Bank, decided to manage the turbulent foreign exchange market instead of specialized and scientific measures. Introduce some amount of currency secretly and informally into the smuggling market so that it can control prices.

At this point, Meysam Khodaei, an adviser to the then-president’s office, introduces a man named Salar Aga Khani, a young man born in the 70’s and inexperienced in this field, to Iraq, to ​​take responsibility for selling currency in the informal market in secret.

It turns out later that God took large bribes from the Aga Khan to do this.

The Aga Khan thus entered into cooperation with the Central Bank and so-called engaged in tomorrow’s transactions in the informal foreign exchange market, which was declared illegal by the Central Bank at that time.

To enter this task, the Aga Khani first deposits 20 million dirhams in the Central Bank account as a deposit and a guarantee, which will be returned to him after 2 weeks by the order of the Iraqi!

Thus, in an opaque and illegal process, which, of course, with the knowledge of Seif, the Governor of the Central Bank, between 5 and 8 million dollars of the country’s valuable foreign exchange resources were given to the Aga Khan at each stage, and this process continues for a total of 28 stages. / p>

Consequences of Central Bank wrong decision

The wrong decision of the Central Bank not only does not help to control the price of foreign currency, but also causes the irregular smuggling of foreign currency out of Iran and wastes about 160 million dollars and 20 million euros from the country’s foreign exchange resources.

The Aga Khan not only in a completely monopolistic and illegal action gave the currency received from the Central Bank to only 15 exchange offices instead of distributing it among about 600 official exchange offices in the country, but also poured a significant part of it into the pockets of brokers and smugglers. In the meantime, the real consumer of the foreign exchange market has not benefited from this country’s capital.

The Central Bank, despite knowing how the Aga Khan distributed currency, did not take any action and in fact ignored these violations.

Aga Khani receives foreign currency from the Central Bank in 28 stages, in which only 6 stages of monitoring agents were present, and in other stages almost no monitoring was carried out on his actions, and the whole process of pricing, delivery, sale and settlement of government currency He has been in charge of himself with the Central Bank, which is one of the important mistakes of Saif and other managers of the Central Bank in this case.

Another strange point is that, after the arrest of the Aga Khan, the Central Bank sent an official letter to the judiciary asking for his release. In that letter, wrong information is given to the judicial authorities and the Central Bank tries to change the course of the case, and the compiler of that letter is one of the convicts in this case.

Finally, it was on August 4, 1998 that the first hearing of the case of the currency disruptors related to the Central Bank was held in the second branch of the Special Court for Economic Corruption. Following the proceedings and judicial proceedings, the court ruled in favor of the defendants in the above case.

The then head of the Central Bank was sentenced to 10 years in prison, Ahmad Araghchi to 8 years and Salar Aghakhani to 13 years in prison

Zabihullah Khodaeian, the spokesman of the Judiciary, today (October 15) announced the verdicts as follows:

The first-degree defendant, Waliullah Seif, the then head of the Central Bank, was accused of disturbing the order and tranquility of the country’s foreign exchange market and paving the way for the illegal sale and purchase of foreign currency in the amount of 159 million and 800 thousand dollars and 20 million and 500 thousand euros. He was also sentenced to 10 years in prison for negligence and mismanagement during his tenure.

The second defendant, Seyyed Ahmad Araghchi, the then Deputy Foreign Minister of the Central Bank, was also sentenced to eight years in prison on the same charges.

The third defendant, Salar Agakhani, was sentenced to 13 years in prison for illegally buying and selling foreign currency, as well as paying bribes to Meysam Khodaei, an employee of the then Presidential Institution, and Seyed Rasoul Sajjad, the then International Director of the Central Bank.

Meysam Khodaei, one of the other defendants in this case, was sentenced to five years in prison and fined equivalent to the price of money received and permanently suspended from government services on charges of receiving bribes and participating in the illegal sale and purchase of currency.

Seyyed Rasoul Sajjad, the then international director of the Central Bank’s foreign exchange department, is one of the other defendants in the case. And sentenced to permanent dismissal from government service

The case involved a total of 10 defendants, including some other central bank officials who have been sentenced to prison, while some of these defendants have other cases pending before the judiciary.

It is worth mentioning that the sentences issued for these convicts are final and binding.

End of message

اخبار سیاسی |

The spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of our country strongly denied the surprising new claims of the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev against the Islamic Republic of Iran at the Summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States and called them false.

According to ISNA, Saeed Khatibzadeh stated: “Such media accusations are solely in the interests of the Zionist regime to affect the fraternal relations between the two nations of Iran and Is Azerbaijan.
Emphasizing the leading role of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the fight against drug trafficking, Khatibzadeh emphasized: “Sacrificing thousands of martyrs and wounded during the last 4 decades in the fight against this sinister phenomenon is just one leaf of the committed and continuous efforts of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” It is in this direction that it has been repeatedly approved by the relevant international institutions.
Emphasizing the strong fraternal relations between the two countries, Khatibzadeh stated: “Unfortunately, it seems that despite the private and positive messages received from Baku in various contacts, there is an intention for Baku to make baseless media statements, which of course An appropriate answer will be given instead.
End of message

اخبار سیاسی |

The head of the judiciary said in an expert meeting to review the problems related to Article 477: “I personally believed and seek to shorten some complex and corrupt processes with the cooperation of the government and parliament.” To reduce the problems of the people as the structure of the judiciary becomes more transparent, agile and efficient.

People’s Problems In the period of “Transformation and Excellence”, an expert meeting was held on the subject of “Causes and factors of the formation of Article 477 cases”.

Article 477 is a request for a retrial to the head of the judiciary in cases in which a verdict is alleged to have been issued in violation of Islamic law.

At the beginning of the meeting, Hojjat-ul-Islam Wal-Muslimin Mortazavi Moghaddam, the head of the Supreme Court, presented a report on the latest statistics of current cases related to Article 477 and the process of reviewing them, saying that this article has become a problem for the Supreme Court.

He noted that the number of requests for retrial under this article was increasing and delayed, noting that a significant portion of these requests were based on erroneous grounds and could not be pursued at all, in the spirit of the law, which is limited. It is against the law to re-examine the rulings, it is contradictory.

At the meeting, the head of the judiciary emphasized the need for professional and technical input to find the root of the challenges in the country’s judicial system, noting that complex laws and processes inside and outside the judiciary have been troublesome to the people and have led to corruption and slowness. Should be corrected.

Hojjat-ul-Islam and Muslims Mohseni Ejei said: “I personally believed and I seek to shorten some complex and corrupt processes with the cooperation of the government and parliament in order to reduce the problems of the people with more transparent, agile and efficient structures.

He pointed to the complexities of the tax law and the licensing process, for example, and said that the long and layered processes in these areas, in addition to creating problems for the people, are certainly corrupting.

The head of the judiciary referred to Article 477 as one of the most complex judicial processes and, emphasizing the need to facilitate this process, explained the path taken to correct this process and stated: In one period, specialized branches will consider the request. There was a retrial, which was later found to be ineffective.

Mohseni Ejei added: “At another point, the issue of Article 18 was raised, which stated that if a ruling was contrary to the Shari’a and the law, it should be reconsidered, but later the question arose as to who and what authority ruled that the vote was illegal.” Where is it?

He continued: “At that time, assuming that rulings against Sharia law should be rare, it was said that it is up to the head of the judiciary to decide, but when the demand for retrial increases, the head of the judiciary certainly can not do everything himself.” Read the files.

The head of the judiciary stated that in these circumstances, the head of the judiciary has to leave the case to the trusted and experienced judges if they are not among the non-delegated issues, and he himself, without studying the case, will give their opinion. Sign.

Mohseni Ejei added: “At one time, the then head of the judiciary did the same thing, but due to the sensitivity of the issue and the need to do so by people with accurate understanding and inference, who sometimes have to tell the expert about his expert opinion.” Explain the power that would prolong the long-term process.

The head of the judiciary, stating that “prolongation of the process of applying Article 477 causes dissatisfaction among the people”, raised the question of why a judge should issue a verdict that is contrary to Islamic law, and why in some cases, this Can the problem be repeated?

If the judge issues a ruling contrary to Islamic law, he should be questioned and held accountable in the relevant authorities.

Mohseni Ejei, meanwhile, said that sometimes there is a difference of opinion on an issue and that a judge may have an opinion that differs from that of another judge, which cannot be considered contrary to Islamic law.

The head of the judiciary considered unacceptable the continuation of the implementation of Article 477 of the law with the current conditions of long-term and complex proceedings.

In this meeting, Hojjatoleslam and Muslims Mossadegh, First Deputy of the Judiciary, Hojjatoleslam Ghodrati and Rahimi, Legal and Judicial Deputies of the Judiciary, and Hojjatoleslam and Muslims Montazeri, Attorney General, also presented their views on Article 477 and how it can be implemented and The field did.

Emphasizing the need to rectify this process, the head of the judiciary called on the Deputy Judiciary and the President of the Supreme Court to consider cases under Article 477 on a non-electoral basis, and to deal with cases involving a provincial court or judge. During a month or a few months, a branch that has been found to be in violation of Islamic law should seriously pursue the matter and ask the relevant judge for the reason.

Hojjat-ul-Islam and Muslims Mohseni Ejei also instructed the Legal Deputy of the Judiciary, with the help of other judicial departments and using the opinions of experts and members of the Judiciary Commission, to examine the causes and factors of Article 477 petitions and provide corrective solutions on how to implement this article. کردن. P>

End of message

اخبار سیاسی |